PGP-ABM

III Term/2002 - 2003                                       

One Unit

 

MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

 

Anil K Gupta

 

Indian agriculture has made spectacular gains since mid sixties, thanks to the green revolution. However, the growth achieved earlier is becoming difficult to sustain.  The declining productivity of various inputs.  has become a major constraint. One has to use more water, fertilizer, pesticides, energy, and other inputs to get the same amount of output. The crisis in agriculture sector has become even more serious in the post GATT phase of increased global competitiveness and reduced ability of state to subsidize various inputs.  The nature is also finding difficult to continue to bear with all the negative externalities. And yet biotechnology and other newer technologies in the field of precision agriculture are opening new avenues of possible growth. In some cases, these technologies also raise ethical dilemma, which we need to confront and deal with adequately.

 

It is often argued that since the average level of consumption of chemical inputs in developing country is much lower than in developed countries, there was no cause of concern. It is also assumed that decline in productivity was inevitable as a ’normal’ natural resource function. These assumptions are questioned in this course.

 

Although the growth processes in agricultural sector have been affected by several factors, including declining public and private investment, and supply of credit, in this course we have focused only on the technological and ecological factors.  What are the challenges before research planners and corporate leaders engaged in technological change in making a transition to sustainable agriculture? This course provides to the participants, an understanding and appreciation of not only  difficulties  lying ahead  but  also  concrete alternatives that  are  emerging  from alternative  agriculture movement with in India and abroad (  particularly  the  Honey bee experience). The course also tries to highlight the potential that exists for organic and non-chemical agriculture in European as well as domestic markets.  Experience with regard to linkage between consumers and producers of alternative agriculture in various countries will also be shared.

 

Case studies based on innovations by farmers as well as ecopreneurs will particularly be highlighted to understand the emerging technological frontiers.  The role of the low external input technologies in making Indian agriculture globally competitive will be discussed in the light of post GATT and CBD        (Convention on Biological Diversity) agreements. The role of Intellectual Property Rights, Farmers’ Rights (under FAO Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources) and other provisions of WTO dealing with non-actionable subsidies for making transition to sustainable agriculture, will also be discussed. The implications of discussions on trade and environment in Committee on Trade and Environment under WTO will be reviewed with specific reference to IPRs, Biotechnology and environmental standards. The issues related to biosafety protocol, precautionary principle, risk in transgenic crops for environment and human safety will also be dealt with.

 

 

Pedagogy and evaluation:

 

The course participants will evolve initiatives that corporate leaders and research managers can take in making the transition through project work. In addition, students will be encouraged to make class presentation on at least one topic aided by the faculty. Each session will be of two hours duration unless otherwise specified. Evaluation will be based on following outputs:

 

 

OUTPUTS                              WEIGHTAGE

Class presentation                 25 per cent

Quizzes                                    15

Project Report                        35

Final Test                                25

 

SESSION WISE OUTLINE

 

Session 1 & 2 THE CRISIS OF MODERN AGRICULTURE

 

Why has modern agriculture led to erosion of the stocks of natural capital in a way that future growth of agriculture sector is seriously compromised? Several dimensions have to be looked into:

 

a)       Soil fertility and structure, erosion and conservation

b)       Treadmill effect due to intensive use of chemical pesticides

c)       Declining ground water and problems of water logging, salinity and alkalinity

d)       Declining  biodiversity  in  agriculture  and  forests with implications  for diffusion of pest and diseases,      soil nutrient management and micro-climatic variabilities

e)       Decline of common property resources such as grazing lands, area for manure pits, drainage lines, water bodies, etc.

 

What are the pathways through which inter-linkages between different sub-systems of farming system can be studied?

 

Essential Readings:

  1. Pathways showing inter linkages between different components of a farming system (AKG)
  2. Sustainability of Indian Agriculture: Green Revolution Revisited (AKG)
  3. Carol Canada, 2001, Agriculture:  A list of websites, The National Council for Science and Environment, CRS, Washington DC .

www.cnie.org/NLE/CRSreports/Agriculture/ag-80.cfm

Desirable Reading:

  1. Beare, M. H.; Cameron, K. C.; Williams, P. H. and Doscher, C. Soil Quality Monitoring For Sustainable Agriculture.NZPPS Paper.

www.hortnet.co.nz/publications/nzpps/proceedings/97/97_520.htm

 

Session 3 & 4 SOCIAL PRESSURES FOR TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES

 

a)       Consumer preference for safe food in the export markets

b)       Environmental regulations in the post-GATT phase

c)       Ecological  movements in developing as well as developed  countries

d)       Farmer  movements  for sustainable as well  as  non-sustainable agriculture

e)       International organic agriculture movement

 

Essential Readings:

 

1.        Diver Steve, 2000, Towards a Sustainable Agriculture, New Renaissance, 6 (2), p.6

http://www.ru.org/artagri.htm

2.        2001. Alternative Agriculture related internet sites and documents, the Alternative Farming  Systems Information Centre.

http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/afslinks.htm.

 

Desirable Reading:

3.        Nadkarni, M.V., “Farmer Movements in India, New Delhi: Allied Publishers, 1987, p.237.

4.        FAO. 2002. Safe food and Nutritious Diet for Consumers. World Food Summit five year later 10-13 June, 2002

www.fao.org/worldfoodsummit/sideevents/ papers/y6656e.htm

 

.

Session 5 & 6  CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

 

a)    Historical basis of sustainability in traditional agriculture and challenge of increasing food

        demand

b)   Sustainability of production systems, lifestyles, values and institutions of resource management:

       eco-institutional perspective

c)   Ethical basis of sustainability: six principles of bio-ethics

 

Essential Readings:

 

  1. Munshi,  K.M.  “The Gospel of the Dirty Hand”, New Delhi:  Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1951.
  2. Gupta, Anil K., 1995, “Sustainable Institutions for Natural Resource Management:  How do we participate in people’s plans?” by APDC in “People’s Initiatives for Sustainable Development:  Less­ons of Experience”. (Eds., Syed Abdus Samad, Tatsuya Watanabe and Seung-Jin Kim), Chapter 15, pp.341-373
  3.  Gupta, A.  K. 1985. Socio-Ecological Paradigm for Analyzing Problems of Poor  in  Dry  Regions, Ecodevelopment News, (Paris) No.32-33, March 1985,pp 68-74.

 

 Desirable Readings:

  1. Modernizing Indian Agriculture:  Priority, Tasks and Critical Policies, August 31, 2000, http://www.rbi.org.in/  Press release : 2000-2001/328
  2. Rigby, Dan and Daniel Caceres, 1997, The Sustainability of Agricultural Systems,  Working Paper No.10, Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, http://www. idpm.man.ac.uk/wp/rr/rr_wp10.pdf
  3. Rhoades, R. E. Participatory Watershed Research and Management: Where the Shadows Falls.

http://www.iied.org/agri/gatekeepers/gatekeep.html

7.      Sustainaibility: Agriculture and Society

www.aces.uiuc.edu/~asap/resources/pdf/AE90-6.pdf

 

Session 7. MODELS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

 

a)   Theory of induced technological innovation

b)   Eco-political economic model

c)     Models of technological diffusion (lab to land)

d)     Farmers  knowledge system (land to lab to land or farmer to farmer)

 

Essential Readings:

 

1.       Farmers’ Innovations and Agricultural Technologists:  Building Sustainable Links, Presented at International Symposium on Strategies For Sustainable Mountain Agriculture, September 10-14, 1990, ICIMOD, Nepal.  Published in Sustainable Mount Agriculture,   entitled, “Farmer’s Innovations and Agricultural   Technologies” (Eds.N.S.Jodha, M.Banskota and Tej Partap), Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi.  pp.  393-412., 1992.

2.        Cowan, Tadlock, 2000, Precision Agriculture: A Primer, Washington DC, CRS, Washington: The National Council for Science and the Environment.

www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/ Agriculture/ag-97.cfm

3.        Gupta, A. K. and Bansal, Y. 1988. Model of Technology generation and diffusion: A Review.

 

Desirable Reading:

4.      Gupta, A. K. 1990. Scientist’s view of farmers’ practices in India: Barriers to effective interaction. In “Farmer First, Farmer innovation and agricultural research” edited by Robert Chambers, Arnold Pacey, and Lori Ann Thrupp. pp 24-30, 1989.   A slightly abridged version is published in Rural Finance, 1990, 3 (1), pp. 24-31.

5.        Lele, Sharachchandra, “Sustainable Development: A Critical Review”, World Development, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1991, pp. 607- 621.

6.        Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development… Concept,  Canada: IISD,  www.iisd1.iisd.ca/ic/info/ss9507.htm

7.        Srinivasan , A. Relevance of Precision farming Technologies to Sustainable Agriculture in Asia and the Pacific. Ph. D. Research work.

 www.geocities.com/ancha_s/thaipaper.html

8.        Rhoades, R. Contextualising Sustainability for Mountain Agriculture.  www.panasia.org.sg/nepalnet/socio/rhoades.htm

9.        2000. Sustainable Agriculture and Globalised Economy. Report for discussion at the Tripartite Meeting on Moving to Sustainable Agricultural development through the Modernization of Agriculture and Employment in a Globilized Economy. Geneva, 18-22 September, 2000.

www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/ sector/techmeet/tmad00/tmad-r.pdf

 

Session 8. TECHNOLOGICAL APPRAISAL FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE:

 

a)        The  concept of externalities over time, space,  sector and species

b)        Attributes of externalities

c)        Ex-ante and ex-post transaction costs to internalize externalities

d)        Options for private resource use

e)       Options for common property resource management

f)        Linkage between the private and CPR resources

g)       Self-design institutions for resource management

 

Essential Reading:

1.        Gupta,  A.K., and Prakash Aseem, “On Internalization of Externalities, IIMA Working  Paper   

No.1126, August 1993.

2.     Gupta,  A.K 2001. Criteria and Indicators of Sustainability An Introduction in Criteria and

indicators of sustainability:  A Natural Resource Perspective.Eds . Anil K. Gupta. Oxford & IBH

 Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.

 

Desirable reading

3.     Gupta, A. K. 1986. Socio Ecology of Stress: Why do common Property Resource Management Projects Fail?: A Case Study of Sheep and Pasture Development Project in Rajasthan, India -, in Proceedings of Common Property Research Conference, 1984, National  Research  Council, Washington, D.C. USA,, pp. 305-322.

4.     Gupta, A. K. and Sinha, R. Criteria and indicators of sustainability: An Executive Summary.

Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.

 

Session 9.PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS FOR TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

 

a)   Scientists’ perception of farmer’s problems

b)   Designing agenda for research

c)   Research-industry-trade  linkages influencing technological change

d)   Feedback process for technological changes: missing links

 

Essential Readings:

1.      Gupta  A. K. “Transferring Science for Development and diffusion of Technology:  Agenda for Recasting Extension Science Research for Drylands/Rainfed Regions

2.    Gupta, A. K.; Gaikwad, V. R.; Khandwalla, P. N.; Pandey, I. M. and Srivastava, U. K. 1991. Reorganization for Revitalization: Issues and Perspectives. CMA, IIM, Ahmedabad.

 

Session 10.FROM PROBLEM SOLVING TO SOLUTION AUGMENTING STRATEGIES:

 

a)   Farmers innovations for sustainable agriculture

b)   Ecopreneurship at grassroots level

c)   Networks of innovators: case of Honey Bee network

 

Essential Readings:

1.        Biggs, Stephen D., “Informal R&D”, Ceres Vol. No. 76, July- August, 1980.

2.      Gupta, A. K.1989. Maps drawn by farmers and extensionists. In Chambers, Robert et. al. (Ed), Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, London Intermediate Technology Publication, 1989, pp. 86-92.

3.        Gupta, A. K. 2000. Grassroots Innovations for Survival, ILEIA Newsletter, Vol.16, No.2

 

Session 11. TRANSITION TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE:

 

Case of Sustainable Pest Management (SPM)

 

a)       Conceptual and operational framework for SPM including biotechnological alternatives

b)       Heuristic for creative problem solving

c)       Policy context for technological transition

 

Essential Reading:

  1. Pastakia A. R. Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Development: the Case of Agricultural Pest Management unpublished dissertation. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management. (selected pages)

 

Desirable Readings:

  1. Gips,  T.1987.  Breaking the Pesticide Habit : Alternatives to  Twelve  Hazardous  Pesticides, Minnesota : IASA Publication, 1987, 372 p.
  2. Pimbert,  M. P.1991. “Designing Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable and  Productive Futures”, IIED Gatekeeper Series, No. 29, London : IIED, 1991.
  3. Thurston,  D. 1992. Sustainable Practices for Plant Disease  Management in Traditional  Farming Systems, New Delhi :  Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., 1992.

 

 

Session 12. CASE OF LIVESTOCK FEED, BREED AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT

 

a)       Biotechnological alternatives and their sustainability

b)       Indigenous animal husbandry and veterinary care

c)    Drought and livestock management policy

 

Essential Readings:

  1. Heykoop, J. and Segarra, A. E. 2000. Animal Agriculture: Current Issues, CRS, Washington: The National Council for Science and the Environment.

www.cnie.org/NLE/CRSreports/Agriculture/ag-94.cfm

 

Session 13. CASE OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION IN DRY REGIONS AND HILLS

 

a)       Harnessing traditional  Wisdom in Watersheds

b)     Watershed management and institution building

 

Essential Readings:

1.     Harnessing wisdom for watersheds (Akg and others, 2000 forthcoming)

 

Desirable reading:

  1. Global study reveals new warning signals: Degraded agricultural lands threaten world’s food protection capacity, aamor@wri.org

www.newsroom.wri.org/newsrelease_text.cfm?NewsReleaseID=76

 

Session 14. INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT FOR LOW EXTERNAL INPUT AGRICULTURE

 

a)   Models of organic certification

b)   Emerging  consumer  consciousness in India:  findings  of  a survey by PGP students

c)   Challenges  in transition, linkages with  biotechnology  and biosafety

 

Essential Readings:

  1. Model  by-laws of organic certification
  2. Gupta , A. K. Consumer Response to Green Market Opportunities.” Emerging Consumer Consciousness in India about Eco-friendly Produce:  Findings of a survey by PGP students of IIMA” (unpublished).
  3. DeGregori R.Thomas, 1996, Can Organic Agriculture Feed the World, Priorities For Health, Vol.8, No.4.

www.acsh.org/publications/priorities/ 0804/agriculture.html

  1. Factors Influencing Organic Agriculture Policies with a focus on Developing

        Countries.              Nadia Scialabba

        http://www.fao.org/organicag/doc/BaselSum-final.doc

Essential Readings:

  1. Changing Consumption and Production Patterns: Organic Agriculture. Background paper no. 4, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Commission on Sustainable Development Eight Session, 24 April – 5 May, 2000, New York.

 www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd8/ecn172000-bp4.pdf

  1. Organic Agriculture Worldwide: A Fast-Growing Reality. www.lightparty.com/Health/OrganicAgricultureWW.html
  2. Geier, B.; McNeely, J. A. and Stoiton, S.  The Relationship between Nature Conservation, Biodiversity and Organic Agriculture.

www.iucn-ero.nl/whatsnew_files/pdf/ifoam.PDF

 

Session 15. ECOPRENEURS: AGENTS OF CHANGE - FOUR CASE STUDIES

 

Vermiculture: Case of Concept Selling (H. Jambhekar)

Kunup  Jal  and  Vrukshayurveda:  Harnessing  socio-cultural motivations (G.L. Atara and Vallabhbhai Gothi)

Indiara: Overcoming bureaucratic hurdles (M.N. Sukhatme)

Uplenchwar  formula: An innovative diffusion strategy  (P.D.Uplenchwar)

 

Essential Reading:

1.        Pastakia A. R. Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Development: the Case of Agricultural Pest  Management  unpublished dissertation. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute  of  Management. (selected pages)

 

 

Session 16. & 17 POLICY  AND ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR LINKING FORMAL  AND INFORMAL SCIENCE

 

a)   Corporate investment in agricultural research: a case study

b)   Inter-organizational networking in research

c)   Public  policy for supporting local innovations  and  enterprises

 

Essential Reading:

  1. Gupta, A.K. and Singh, R. 1991. “Corporate Investment in Agriculture Research : Issues  in Sustainable Development”,  W.P. No. 932, Ahmedabad : IIMA, May 1991.
  2. Can We Add Without Subtraction:  Some Awkward Questions for Revitalizing Agricultural  Research  Strategies, in Proceedings of First Agricultural Science  Congress, Ed. Prem Narain, New Delhi, National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 1993, pp.122-129.

 

Desirable Reading:

  1. Gupta, A. K. and. Mohammad Rais, 1995 Managing Research Networks:  A Study of Inter Organizational Linkages, IIMA mimeo

 

Session 18 & 19. RISK AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

 

a.              Biosafety protocol

b.             Risk analysis and management

c.              Precautionary principle

Essential Readings:

1.        Parish, Mickey, 1999, Science Behind the Regulation of Food Safety:  Risk Assessment and the Precautionary Principle, Washington: National Council for Science and Environment, CRS

www.cnie.org/nle/crsreports/risk/rsk-29.cfm

2.        Segarra, E.Alejandro, 2000, Biosafety Protocol for Genetically Modified Organisms:  Overview, Washington DC, The National Council for Science and the Environment, CRS,  www.ncseonline.org/nle/crsreports/ agriculture/ag-93.cfm

3.        Gupta , A. K. 2000.  Precaution and the survival threshold : Oscillatons between the Plimsoll lines. Key note paper presented at the conference on Biotechnology in the Global Economy: Science and the Precautionary Principle, Harvard University, Boston, 22-23 September 2000

Essential Readings:

4.        Mugo, S. and Hoisington, D. 2001. Biotechnology for the improvement of maize for resource poor farmers: The CIMMYT Approach. Second National Maize Workshop of Ethopia, 12-16 November, 2001.

www.cimmyt.org/worldwide/CIMMYT_Regions/CIMMYT_Africa/ procee_Ethiopia/31Biotechnology.pdf

5.        Persley, G. J. Agricultural Biotechnology: Global Challenges and Emerging Science.

www.cabi-publishing.org/Bookshop/ReadingRoom/ 0851998164/0851998164Ch1.pdf

6.        The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 17th July, 2001.

www1.oecd.org/bangkok/presjohnstone.doc

 

Session 20. ETHICAL ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE:

 

Essential Readings :

1.     Gupta, A. K. 1994. Social and Ethical Dimensions of Ecological Economics, Key Note Paper  invited presentation  at  the  To Earth  of  International  Society  of  Ecological Economics, Costa Rica, October, 1994

2.     Gupta, A. K. 1994. Suggested Ethical Guidelines for Accessing and Exploring Biodiversity - A Pew Conservation Scholars Initiative, October 21, 1994 (A collective effort of Pew Conservation  Scholars  based on three background notes including G 16 and G 17), published in Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 5 (Japan), March 1995, pp.38-4.

 

 

Session 21 & 22: INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY: ENVIRONMENTAL AND IPR DEBATES IN WTO, 1995-2000

 

Essential Reading :

1.     Gupta, A. K. 2000. Environmental Implications of Intellectual Property Protection (IPP):  Can individual and community conservation ethic and creativity be rewarded through IPP, paper prepared for  UNEP, Geneva, 2000.

2.        Gupta, A. K.; Chandak, V. S. and Matlon, A. 2001. Competitive Strategy for Agricultural Exports Through Value addition:  The Intellectual Property Rights Perspective. The draft note is prepared for the discussions in the meeting of Gujarat Government committee On WTO and Agriculture , Sept 3, 2001, IIMA campus, Ahmedabad

 

Session 23, 24 & 25: PROJECT PRESENTATION & OVERVIEW OF THE COURSE

 

TOP